This blog was created in October 2011 to offer students the language faculty and students of secondary space to LOOK BEYOND WHAT WE CAN OFFER A TEXT. In addition, through the blog the students can go to see the activities in class and only serve to consultation literature. They may also use the information to read various works of different authors. This is a place for writing, for those who read for those interested in culture and dare to dive into it and contribute their bit. I have to say that I personally enjoyed. The group has been very active, too much sometimes, hehe .. I had to put Miss Rottenmeyer plan to be quiet and listen to me a while to me, that's why they paid me
but it is nice to see the interest and enthusiasm attendees and in this course. After finalizing the workshop we went to dinner together to celebrate. The truth is that I was ashamed to be ended, and it seems to them too. So we decided to continue after Easter raising the bar a notch. We will workshop Stories In his blog Moleskine Literary, Peruvian writer Ivan Thays played an exciting list: Lists of the site taken note, is that the rules for writers, six in all, he proposed George Orwell in his essay Politics and the English Language (1946 .) The author of 1984 and Animal Farm was also, as we know, journalist and essayist, and Politics These past days I hung up on the blog two entries with videos in which two separate recited poems. Both texts have over twenty years and were published in his day, in literary journals short-lived but intense and those fond memories. They belonged to a book as a whole, is unprecedented, although it has been published piecemeal. Revisited now for a new commitment, I made modifications to the ancient poems and I added two videos recorded for the water project, whose final version will not recited. Like many of the things I do in La Acequia, have been an exercise in style, cool writing styles and publishing: create is not nothing but a constant exercise that never ends and there who think you've got the perfect poem because every text published is only an approximation and a score. For me it was very important way in which these entries have come to the regular visitors of this area and your comments on the entries. Because nothing like the blog allows an author to know the reaction of those who follow him and given to each entry in places, times and situations and nothing monotonous. I wanted to join several of the issues that can make a blog and that, somehow or other, I had experienced before. He was aware of the risk. Not too long ago, someone told me when I recited a passage from Don Quixote for an input of the collective reading of this work we did here, that bothered him: the voice felt very personally. I did not understand, but that does not matter now if he was affected by the rupture of the field staff who was who recited or heard recited, both very interesting to be thoughtful. I did not think that my voice is exposed because it was part of my thoughtful way to publish that entry. Basically, many people can not even consider the blog rather than written word combined with the image (each gives preference to one or the other) and are surprised to other possibilities, when it is an effective tool to add all the artistic possibilities . This usually happens with those who have experienced reading as something intimate, reserved for personal areas. One of the most interesentes at the reception of artistic production in the twentieth century is to see how it has turned to the form of reception. From the spread of literacy and economic possibilities of using literacy, this has been reduced to private spaces (such as it is to read a book on the subway or a coffee shop, isolating all that one around it) and it is becoming less public. A significant reversal of the form of consuming culture which was previously predominantly oral. Hence, the recitation of a poem, does not respond to our way of reading for yourself, we produce a strange feeling. Even the theater has changed completely: since the late nineteenth century, it was decided to turn off the lights in the room (in Spain was the first actress Maria Guerrero who introduced this practice because he felt that the public would see her and not neighbors of box): there is an illusion of intimacy. In fact, one of the most important art forms of the twentieth century and so far today is to break the illusion and the public face of the show with the reality that attends a collective space and nothing personal. The same movements involved behind like singer-songwriters: his songs became hymns to be sung with collective group consciousness. But on this we will come back another day because, in fact, the internet has also broken with privacy in the reception of art: he uses the tools of Web 2.0 feel part of a group known to be received immediately by the author. As much as open your computer late at night, in the solitude of his room. Like all forms of publication, the blog has its risks because what matters is not so much the production of texts and their reception. In fact, developing the potential of the Internet has provided, in a manner not previously known by both the simplicity of tools like the convenience and diversity of use-we can unburden our different breeding systems videos, texts, programs television or radio, to view / listen when we want. Occur, then mismatches interesting: our favorite morning radio, heard on the subway when we go to work, we are bored to death, the festive din of the program that we never lose at five in the afternoon, heard uncomfortable the night shift of our work. The poem I found in his recitation, we conmocionaba we find, in an inappropriate situation, false. Or the reverse: heard in the favorable climate, what we found is fascinating pretentious. It happens with some movies: view at the time we were overly pretentious, seen again once we understand them. All this in a more intense that what happened to the printed book. A good public recitation should be adapting to the public on pitch, rhythm and play with the emotions. A good public recitation of poetry and a high school class or a promotional presentation for some customers: it is successful it will one day or the next day with another group. The play that in some places works effectively to arouse the tragic emotion, in others it is hilarious. This is, moreover, with the change of time: that movie was lyrical and profound we now seems corny, Becquer's poems that we liked both in adolescence, there comes a time when we are unbearable and sentimental, the clothes with how comfortable we were in the eighties colgarÃamos now not even in our closet. This is impossible, in general terms on the Internet: anyone can publish anything which is controlling the public front, unless you close access to their room for a few who know enough. Not even if you do it via conference call. It adds further that the tools of Web 2.0 bring something that never existed before: the immediate reaction of the receiver, which can comment on the publication directly to the community of readers and to the author. Many authors are not prepared for this: they prefer to ignore their receptors and the role they assumed a refuge, an emotional dam unwilling or support transfer, or not write for anyone but yourself or for those who just give them praise. At best, get in a few weeks of criticism from experts and within months a few words of those who attend his presentations and book signings. After some letters more or less filtered by the editor. This is one of the novelties of this tool: direct connection with who gets what one publishes. At the time that a blog does not filter the comments, are exposed to who says, for better or for worse. Many are not prepared for it and end up closing their space or the possibility of the comments, especially those who think that posting on a blog, although the circuit is not very wide visitors, is join the dynamics that have always writers in traditional formats. If we write a public blog we put ourselves in the same position as an author or journalist who signs your text and we should never ignore this when you start walking because sooner or later will receive an example of what I present and the lesson can be emotionally hard for anyone not prepared enough for her. When someone writes novels or books of poetry, becomes an author. You can not prevent or control the reception of his works are. Neither can the image readers to believe the author who assiduously follow. In the press, which is more immediate than the book, fixed columnists end up creating a character, that is who offers to readers and not have to match the actual author even if you have points in common with him, which many readers are not prepared to make. Inevitably, who writes a blog and who visit on a daily basis for years, they incur the same more or less conscious but their receptors have a potential for interaction did not have the traditional formats. And their reception conditions are as diverse as those of these formats, but condensed into a few hours or even minutes. Therefore, further work will be rhetorical approaches to this reception. Which are not always decaffeinated to please everyone in all circumstances. That would give the risk involved in any artistic work or any public display of opinion. Indeed, publishing is a risk, most in this medium that allows the response. Can not publish thinking that what we write and like to be praised, but this is the general trend of readers who tend to be kind and to strengthen the ego of the writer. This blog is posed in such a way that does not allow dissent, only admiration for the high sensitivity of the author. This is fine as a game, but I was not satisfied. I understand that a blog should involve controversy, dissension, confrontation joyfully (on friendliness), not ending a string of accolades that are paid in the same direction. I understand that the world of Peter Ojeda is very rich, but it's good that someone put your finger in the eye once because if something is good about this world of blogging is to help us rebuild, to investigate, to deepen , to argue. There is nothing I like less than praise without the hint of merciless criticism. I offer as far as I know, angle of divergence for all does not turn into the bonfire of the vanities. Nothing is so enriching ruthless vision of oneself. Can not publish the public thinking that we have before but is open to criticism of course. I just deleted a comment on my blog and was one that was highly offensive in the sexual sense, homophobic and miserable. In all other cases the discrepancy, the exchange of sensibilities is exhilarating. I think this blog provides suggestive angles but also as a contribution worth enriching dissent. Best regards. Very interesting contribution Joselu. I also think that the intelligent and constructive disagreement is very healthy. Not everything has to be praise, of course. Besotes 2.0 M. I think the author should not be taken into account in exercising the creative exercise more freely. Creating is transmitted, ie send and receive and there can be no art form is missing one of the two parties .. .. transmitter or receiver independent of when the work is performed or the place of receipt. Just as the receiver is required to understand the work over time and the circumstances in which this was done and if not, will not know anything. The work of art is universal that hovers above the times and events to the receiver by transmitting the beauty of all time and conditions. Irrigation is something that instinctively assumes from the very moment you think. If all entenderiemaos criticism as a mere social disharmony and would like to impose our views as absolute truth, the general public would be more tolerant of all the good that this entails. But there are ways and ways of saying the same thing. Perhaps, here some are saved and others receive more despiadas volleys imaginable. Joselu: The only thing that I disagree with you on your comment is that this blog does not allow dissent. What I do with my posts is to seek the controversy, there are enough blogs that seek it and promote it because it is the reason for the authors and do not seem to silently say anything but dialogue. Not the same. Talking is built. There are plenty of shouting and deafness. And I prefer that dissents before put your finger in the eye. With this custom Spanish so we'll all wrongs. In dissent, enrich us if we build the dialogue. In La Acequia not seek admiration. Each gives what he has: I do not I can give the controversy, but what I have. Readers of this space feel free to take or leave what I consider, to praise or criticize. That's right: for the sake of praise or criticize will never be my style. is quite subjective, and all these rhetorical and convoluted explanations that people try to explain to me (in my very personal opinion) are tail hairs, Poetry or feel or not feel, it's that simple. If a text and voice who declaims hair for me, is well capitalized POETRY, I have been to many poetry readings, and I will say that I have heard people voice impostan, which are really speakers, but have no will never be that that makes them poets. I am one who feels that reading through the alien voice takes me away dela depth of the original text. I feel that even if he reads experiencing is the author of the text in question! Only in rare cases I have managed to avoid the rupture that causes me not